Like courduroy pillows, Jennifer Lawrence's tits continue to make headlines.
After the initial scandal of leaked nude photos, the debate has meandered on and on (and on) and, just when you thought it was safe to go back on the internet, Ms. Lawrence does an interview with Vanity Fair and the whole issue ignites again to be used as an ideological football by all and sundry like a big, burning, kickable mixed metaphor of tits.
...
For the record, I think everything has been somewhat blown out of proportion - and not just by my Xerox machine! HIYOOO!
...Sorry. Look, stealing someone's stuff and spreading it all over the internet is a shitty thing to do. It's illegal. Rightly so. Someone, somewhere is guilty of a crime and should be punished. There should probably be an extra layer of punishment added for the sexual nature of the crime. Anything that happened after the initial hacking, however, has apparently descended into a witch hunt. We're all guilty of being the worst kinds of people if we even consider having a look at leaked pictures of celebrities. The deepest pits of hell are reserved for those of us who thought "hmm, cool, attractive naked women that I wouldn't normally get to see," because of course nobody thought that - the only possible motivation for wanting to see arousing pictures of attractive young ladies is that we're all hateful, misogynist scum who wish nothing but ill for the entire female race, especially those of them we had a fiver on to win an Oscar last year.
The reality from where I sit is that a lot of people just wanted to see someone attractive without any clothes on, which is pretty normal. Not necessarily squeaky clean, morally speaking, but there was certainly never any malice in it on my part, and I'm guessing the same is true for a lot of people.
I like Jennifer Lawrence. I think she's very, very talented. And very pretty. I also think she's over-reacting quite badly to the whole thing, if the Vanity Fair interview is anything to go by. This might be easy for me to say, as thousands of strangers have never looked at intimate pictures of me, but they theoretically could. I've taken naked pictures of myself in the past to send to various people - girlfriends, hook-ups, Grammy winning country musicians...
Weirdly, that was her exact response...
...and if those pictures were leaked and spread all over the place I'd be embarrassed, sure. Angry, too, probably. But I think I'd have to ultimately just shrug and say "Yeah, that's me with my cock out." It's worth bearing in mind that I say this as a non-celebrity. I'm guessing someone who picks a career being stared at by strangers probably has a lot more of the "look at me!" gene than I do, and as such would be even less flustered.
How dare we look at her naked?! Unless she's painted blue and on a 20ft screen...
Naked pictures and videos are a fairly normal part of modern sexuality, and (again) it's totally wrong to steal those pictures and videos from people. Unfortunately, the pendulum of outrage has now swung far enough that we're being told that looking at naked strangers is always wrong.
First there are Ms. Lawrence's comments in Vanity Fair (and let's all just take a moment to appreciate the irony of someone talking about their own naked photos and privacy in a publication whose title means "Beautiful Self Love"), in which she says that she took the photos to send to her boyfriend at the time, because he was "either going to look at porn, or look at [me.]"
I hate to break it to you, Jen, but he did both. I abso-fucking-lutely stone cold guarantee he did. Why? Because people (male, female, young, old, gay, straight) like looking at porn. It's hard-wired into us. The idea that if you're in a relationship you should never look at porn is as silly as the idea that if I have fruit in the house I'll never need to eat donuts. I'm fully aware of which one is healthier and more wholesome, but sometimes you just want a donut. Sometimes you don't want to light incense, drink wine and seduce your partner. Sometimes you just need to jerk off and then get on with your day. I'm sure a lot of women do exactly the same thing, whether they'd admit it or not.
Sadly, the Vanity Fair interview was seized on by a group called Fight The New Drug, an anti-porn group who believe that all forms of pornography are damaging to society and evil and probably giving you hairy palms. In an open letter to Ms. Lawrence that has, in the words of Lisa Simpson "a creepy, Pat Boone-ish quality to it," they try to argue that all porn is exactly as morally wrong as stealing someone's private images; you can tell they're down with the kids because they're super keen on using words like "super" a lot.
The truth is that people like watching other people fuck. We always have. Porn is largely just an extension of sexual fantasy - we just have the technology to put our imagined sexual scenarios on film these days. Saying that all porn is evil and degrading is like saying the early work of the Lumiere brothers was degrading and exploitative to trains.
Are there types of pornography that are degrading and dangerous? Yes. In news that should shock nobody except the Puritans at Fight The New Drug, however, most people don't like porn that is violent or harmful.
Personally, I watch porn. Not because I'm a single man who works six nights a week and therefore has a presence on the dating scene about on a par with the Pope; just because I'm normal and ALL NORMAL PEOPLE WATCH PORN. I don't want to see women getting mistreated. I don't even find it sexy when it's a barbie-looking woman with ill-fitting concrete tits and a borderline eating disorder staring dead-eyed into a camera and grunting too much, which seems to be the image most anti-porn lobbyists have in their heads. What I tend to look for is clips where the woman actually looks like she's enjoying herself, because that's also what I aim for in real-life sex.*
So, Jennifer Lawrence is wrong to think that there's anything to worry about if her boyfriend watches porn. There's nothing wrong with watching it, everyone does it, everyone masturbates (including several of the more intelligent animal species) and she needs to chill out about that. That being said, she's a fantastic actress and doesn't deserve to be robbed and have her pictures strewn around cyberspace.
Whoever hacked Jennifer Lawrence's pictures is the real bad guy here. It was a shitty thing to do, it should be punished, they shouldn't have anything to feel good about. Anyone who looked at the pictures doesn't have much of a moral high ground, but it's human nature and I totally get why people looked.
The people at Fight The New Drug are the sort of creepy, narrow-minded, sexually repressed types that love to proselytize to the rest of us about how we should think, feel and fuck each other. I'm not legally allowed to say that I think they're all into some weird shit, bedroom-wise, but I'll just mention that anyone who takes up a moral crusade about what other people do with their genitals usually gets caught six months later in a public toilet doing something untoward.
All of this furore has ultimately been created over pictures of tits and asses - apparatus owned by 51 and 100% of the population, respectively. Can we please move on now?
*Results may vary.